Posts by FatFreek 2005

10

The 1993 Proclaimers book, PDF available again? (Atlantis, where are you?)

by FatFreek 2005 in

a thread began some 10 years ago when our friend atlantis made a pdf available of jws modern history book.

yes, that book is available on my 2015 library cd but only certain chapters.

naturally, wt eliminated certain entire chapters and you can only guess why.

Gloom and Doom from 100 years ago -- Watch Tower 1918

by FatFreek 2005 in

i thought it would be enlightening to see what jws said 100 years ago.

it's no different as we check out the jan 1, 1918 watch tower and herald of christ's presence.. .

FatFreek 2005

Yes, 1928, when 1914 replaced 1874 as the goto date, establishment of the kingdom. 1914 then replaced 1799 as the beginning of the end.

https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/5073177480790016/26-prophetic-failures-watchtowers-most-heralded-date-1914

10

The 1993 Proclaimers book, PDF available again? (Atlantis, where are you?)

by FatFreek 2005 in

a thread began some 10 years ago when our friend atlantis made a pdf available of jws modern history book.

yes, that book is available on my 2015 library cd but only certain chapters.

naturally, wt eliminated certain entire chapters and you can only guess why.

The 1993 Proclaimers book, PDF available again? (Atlantis, where are you?)

by FatFreek 2005 in

a thread began some 10 years ago when our friend atlantis made a pdf available of jws modern history book.

yes, that book is available on my 2015 library cd but only certain chapters.

naturally, wt eliminated certain entire chapters and you can only guess why.

FatFreek 2005

A thread began some 10 years ago when our friend Atlantis made a PDF available of JWs modern history book.

Yes, that book is available on my 2015 Library CD but only certain chapters. Naturally, WT eliminated certain entire chapters and you can only guess why. In my case of research I needed that graphic where they editorially tore off the top of a magazine that showed a headline, "END OF ALL KINGDOMS IN 1914” -- which was exactly what Watchtower had predicted 25 years prior to 1914 in 1889.

That 10 year old thread, with dead hyperlinks, is here:

28

2018-Message From Watchtower Informant!

by Atlantis in

jw
friends

from one of our informants inside the watchtower.

(same person whosent us videos from the legal dept., accounting dept., pioneer school,and so forth.

) atlantis told him that he is walking on a razors edge,to be extremely careful.his email message:1. watch tower has no right to demand you to sign a consent form.

FatFreek 2005

I think I'm missing something again. Why do we care if they have 'records' on us?

I don't care as I've been out for 41 years. However, if my simply making a request for my records will impose a financial burden / hardship on this borganization, I'm probably going to do it. Multiply my request times thousands of others making their request and they're going to be in a world of financial hurt.

If I, in fact, get a copy of my information I will then be inclined to post it here. It will be interesting to find out the reason for my df as they never called me or notified me via postal service. I learned about it via one of my sons.

21

Gloom and Doom from 100 years ago -- Watch Tower 1918

by FatFreek 2005 in

i thought it would be enlightening to see what jws said 100 years ago.

it's no different as we check out the jan 1, 1918 watch tower and herald of christ's presence.. .

FatFreek 2005

I hope you're right.

21

Gloom and Doom from 100 years ago -- Watch Tower 1918

by FatFreek 2005 in

i thought it would be enlightening to see what jws said 100 years ago.

it's no different as we check out the jan 1, 1918 watch tower and herald of christ's presence.. .

FatFreek 2005

Here's a puzzling set of numbers I found in the Jan 15 issue of WT. You will see scans of the election results for society's officers. I took the few minutes to tally the numbers of voters to the sum of 1,142,980.

Here's where my ignorance shines through. I thought WT membership was in the realm of some 25,000 to 50,000 at that time. Therefore, that sum of more than one million who voted for the officers appears strange. Any thoughts?

21